OH: Proposal would lessen penalties for some sex offenders

Having sex with his now wife and the mother of his three children when she was a 14-year-old high school freshman earned ____ ____ a label he’s found impossible to shake: Tier II sex offender.

Now ____ , and countless others throughout Ohio, may get a break. Proposed changes to Ohio’s sex offender registry would give judges more discretion on what conditions are placed on those convicted of sex crimes and allow offenders like ____ to petition to get off the registry. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is exactly as the new system should work here–I’d be all in favor of!! do not maintain the status quo as to statutory and absurd static 99; but allow a petitioner to go before a judge to provide oral and written testimony as to why he shouldn’t be considered a risk, in the time intervals and manner Ohio will propose. We have two states one where the legislators see the wisdom and another where a district federal appellate court made a state see the errors in their ways, and now California is teetering. C’mon ASCOL dont accept mediocre with throwing 10’s of thousands under the bus. Please negotiate with CASOMB under threat of lawsuit should they not go to at least the Ohio distance!

We’re so close, the time has finally come! we can bring some order and sense in to this chaos. I know you can do it ASCOL, please!!

someone needs to notify all these different entities on the record that they are violating and depriving us of our constitutional rights under color of law…they are knowingly and willfully misrepresenting the facts and evidence or ignoring them with reckless disregard for the truth..they’re in deriliction of their official duties and by a preponderance of the evidence are not acting in good faith but with malice or with the intent to further their personal agendas….
this is exactly what the deprivation of constitutional rights under color of law is written for…

Stephen I would do it but I am positive that I would become a target for police harrasment and I simply can’t afford to be harrassed at school and have the tactical forces banging on my door doing compliance checks once a week..it really needs to be someone who can afford to withstand those actions because it is a real possibility of happening…the best people to do this would be an organization such as this or attorneys but if no one does by the time I’m ready to file my motion then I will be required to inform these entities of their wrongdoings in just such a certified letter…